User Tools

Site Tools


info:march_2013_evaluating_yields

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
info:march_2013_evaluating_yields [2013/03/12 18:13] tomgeeinfo:march_2013_evaluating_yields [2013/03/12 18:14] (current) tomgee
Line 22: Line 22:
   TRGP- Targa (GP for NGLS): 3% growing at 36%   TRGP- Targa (GP for NGLS): 3% growing at 36%
   ENB - Enbridge (2.9% growing at 15%)   ENB - Enbridge (2.9% growing at 15%)
 +
    
 The basic reason for this divide is that investors will pay more for the higher growth rates.This raises the share price and thus lowers the dividend yield.\\ The basic reason for this divide is that investors will pay more for the higher growth rates.This raises the share price and thus lowers the dividend yield.\\
 +
    
 How should one evaluate the two classes? I suggest adding the curent yield to the growth rate to derive an adjusted yield. E.g., assume stock XYZ is valued at 100 and pays a $5 div. per year. Let's assume a constant growth rate of 20% per year. So after 1 year, it pays a $6 dividend. Other things being equal, the market would still be willing to pay $120 for the stock's 5% dividend. This can be verified in several cases: the rise in share price mtches the rise in dividends while the yield remains the same.\\ How should one evaluate the two classes? I suggest adding the curent yield to the growth rate to derive an adjusted yield. E.g., assume stock XYZ is valued at 100 and pays a $5 div. per year. Let's assume a constant growth rate of 20% per year. So after 1 year, it pays a $6 dividend. Other things being equal, the market would still be willing to pay $120 for the stock's 5% dividend. This can be verified in several cases: the rise in share price mtches the rise in dividends while the yield remains the same.\\
 +
    
 But beware that growth rates are choppy and that, worst case, without prospects of continued growth, XYZ might see its "expected growth rate" decline from 20% per year to 0%. This would require the yield to jump to 10% to maintain market interest, i.e., a drop from 100 to 60 as the dividend increases while the yield doubles.\\ But beware that growth rates are choppy and that, worst case, without prospects of continued growth, XYZ might see its "expected growth rate" decline from 20% per year to 0%. This would require the yield to jump to 10% to maintain market interest, i.e., a drop from 100 to 60 as the dividend increases while the yield doubles.\\
 +
    
 In case I've convinced anyone, here's a list with "adjusted yield" > 20:\\ In case I've convinced anyone, here's a list with "adjusted yield" > 20:\\
 +
    
 TRGP, NTI, TLLP, XTXI, XTEX, OKE, EPB, CMP, OKS, SXL TRGP, NTI, TLLP, XTXI, XTEX, OKE, EPB, CMP, OKS, SXL
  
info/march_2013_evaluating_yields.1363126421.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/03/12 18:13 by tomgee