User Tools

Site Tools


politics:social_security_lies_by_democrats

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
politics:social_security_lies_by_democrats [2025/02/19 08:59] 192.168.1.78politics:social_security_lies_by_democrats [2025/02/19 09:01] (current) 192.168.1.78
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Something to ponder: ===== ===== Something to ponder: =====
 History Lesson on Your Social Security Card\\ History Lesson on Your Social Security Card\\
 +
 Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (and some older ones) didn't know this. Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (and some older ones) didn't know this.
 It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family
 and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter
 whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.\\ whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.\\
 +
 Social Security Social Security
 Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and
Line 10: Line 12:
 United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the
 message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION was removed. message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION was removed.
-An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION"message. +An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION"message.\\ 
-Our Social Security+ 
 +==== Our Social Security ==== 
 Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
 Security (FICA) Program. He promised:\\ Security (FICA) Program. He promised:\\
 +
 1) That participation in the Program would be 1) That participation in the Program would be
 completely voluntary,\\ completely voluntary,\\
 No longer Voluntary\\ No longer Voluntary\\
 +
 2) That the participants would only have to pay 2) That the participants would only have to pay
 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
Line 22: Line 28:
 Now 7.65% Now 7.65%
 On the first $90,000.\\ On the first $90,000.\\
 +
 3) That the money the participants elected to put 3) That the money the participants elected to put
 into the Program would be deductible from into the Program would be deductible from
 their income for tax purposes each year,\\ their income for tax purposes each year,\\
 No longer tax deductible\\ No longer tax deductible\\
 +
 4) That the money the participants put in went to the 4) That the money the participants put in went to the
 Independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the Independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the
Line 34: Line 42:
 Under Johnson the money was moved to Under Johnson the money was moved to
 The General Fund and spent. The General Fund and spent.
 +
 5) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed 5) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed
 as income.\\ as income.\\
politics/social_security_lies_by_democrats.1739973552.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/02/19 08:59 by 192.168.1.78